“In my opinion this is not a good omen, unfortunately the fact that this Alliance for Europe, which should have had as its common denominator the pro-European policy of the Republic of Moldova, should have resisted, should have overcome the inconvenient”, Antonescu stated quoted by Mediafax.
He emphasized he was aware of the difficulty in maintaining a political alliance in our neighboring country, but the major interest for the country would have been that the AIE be maintained.
“We are all doing politics, we all have been or are part of alliances, we are all aware of how difficult it is to maintain an alliance, we can understand all that, I believe that the major interest for the Republic of Moldova would have been that this alliance, as a political force established through the citizens votes and which, I repeat, targeted this pro-European policy should have resisted”, the Senate president said.
He pointed out that that the Republic of Moldova needed “coherent political forces, stable”, able to fully commit to the fundamental purpose of getting closer to the EU.
“I believe that if they needed to resort to early elections, or whether another formula could be found, early elections cannot solve much if there aren’t any coherent political forces, stable, focused on a fundamental purpose to which to subordinate everything. But, in the end, it is the politics of another state and I cannot allow myself to say anything more than that ”, Antonescu concluded.
The Government of Moldova, led by Prime Minister Vlad Filat was dismissed after a motion of censure voted by 54 MPs. Within three days, Prime Minister Vlad Filat and his cabinet must resign.
